题目内容双击单词支持查询和收藏哦～

收藏纠错

题目材料：

Only since the late 1960s have literary scholars attempted to establish an accurate and systematic literary history of women novelists. Many previous histories suffered from “Great Traditionalism,”an approach that, by limiting itself to a group of women writers termed “great,” ignored the diversity among women novelists. These histories excluded the minor novelists, who are the links in the chain that binds literary generations together, and who allow us to see the continuities in women's writing. Given the distortions produced by this concentration on “great” writers, as well as the obviously problematic tendency of many literary scholars to apply stereotypes of femininity, it was not surprising that some literary scholars in the early 1960s evaded the important issue of women's sexual identity entirely, focusing instead on the form and style of women's writing. Such an approach, while insightful and very valuable, did not consider the crucial connections between women's writing and changes in their legal and economic status.

According to the passage, some literary scholars in the early 1960s tended to do which of the following in their considerations of women novelists' works?

A.attack the traditional distinction between “great” women novelists and those women novelists considered less important
B.consider sexual identity when evaluating the works of “great” women novelists but not the works of minor women novelists
C.ignore the issue of the sexual identity of women novelists altogether
D. address issues of form and style more frequently when discussing “great” women novelists than when discussing minor women novelists
E.apply more stringent stylistic standards when evaluating minor women writers than when evaluating the group of women writers traditionally termed “great”

C显示答案

登录后才可以添加做题笔记哦，还没有账号？马上注册

· 相关考点

信息题-信息本身及合理推断

以上解析由考满分老师提供。

题目讨论

已经输入 0 个字标记为提问，会有更多小伙伴帮你解答提交

全部讨论

只看提问

按时间排序

按点赞数排序

拓展练习

练习记录

最新提问

题目内容双击单词支持查询和收藏哦～

题目讨论