题目内容

收藏纠错

题目材料：

Federal courts in the United States, especially before the famous 1962 case of Baker v. Carr, were often thought to be powerless in the area of election law, voting rights, and other legal questions clearly bearing on politics. This perception was not entirely correct, of course, as pre-1962 Supreme Court decisions such as that in the case of Smith v. Allwright demonstrated in the wake of that decision, voting participation among African Americans in the South increased substantially. However, political rights had not always been so clearly championed by the Supreme Court as they were in Smith v. Allwright. Indeed, the transformations between the Civil War and 1962 were such that, in reviewing voters` rights cases over the intervening decades, one feels like an archaeologist cutting through distinct layers in which the judicial decisions uncovered reveal a pattern of ideological and societal change.

The author of the passage uses the analogy of the archaeologist most probably in order to

Acontrast judicial decisions made after 1962 concerning voters rights with decision made immediately after the Civil War
Bsuggest that the author is perplexed by many judicial decisions regarding voters` rights
Ccharacterize the nature of change in judicial thinking regarding voters` rights
Dindicate that much of the history of voters` rights has been lost since the Civil War
Eillustrate the lack of concern for voters` rights exhibited by federal courts before the Civil War

C显示答案

登录后才可以添加做题笔记哦，还没有账号？马上注册

以上解析由考满分老师提供。

题目讨论

已经输入 0 个字标记为提问，会有更多小伙伴帮你解答提交

全部讨论

只看提问

按时间排序

按点赞数排序

最新提问

题目内容

题目讨论