最新提问
-
-
-
学员6NOgXB针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
yxxxxuan针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员YuA067针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员dNwr2Y针对QR 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员dNwr2Y针对QR 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵哦针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
gre不放弃针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员6NOgXB针对QR 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
9月的雪狐针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
9月的雪狐针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵哦针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
gre我上早8针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
arnoldyang针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
gre我上早8针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵哦针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员D5VNzL针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵哦针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
gre不放弃针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
清醒小岛1929针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员QOjXoE针对QR 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员6NOgXB针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
yxxxxuan针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员YuA067针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员dNwr2Y针对QR 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员dNwr2Y针对QR 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵哦针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
gre不放弃针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员6NOgXB针对QR 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
9月的雪狐针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
9月的雪狐针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵哦针对RC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
gre我上早8针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
arnoldyang针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
gre我上早8针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵哦针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员D5VNzL针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵呵哦针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
gre不放弃针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
清醒小岛1929针对TC 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
-
-
-
学员QOjXoE针对QR 题目
发表了一个提问 去解答>>
-
我的动态
登录后查看动态
题目内容双击单词支持查询和收藏哦~
题目材料:
Both claims, however, are questionable from the perspective of a strictly historical inquiry, however sensible they may seem from the vantage point of contemporary jurisprudence. Even though originalists are correct in claiming that the search for original meaning is inherently historical, historians would not normally seek to determine exactly what a specific clause or right meant when the Bill of Rights was adopted in 1791, because historians would not normally feel compelled to support attempts to make that "original meaning" binding today. The strictly historical purpose for an inquiry into the original meaning of specific rights would be to determine why a particular clause was adopted and to establish a baseline from which its subsequent evolution could be traced and evaluated.
Because of its proponents' pressing need to find determinate meaning at a fixed historical moment, originalism cannot capture everything that was dynamic and creative-thus uncertain and problematic-in Revolutionary constitutionalism, nor can it easily accommodate the diversity of views that explains why the debates of the Revolutionary era were so lively. A strictly historical approach, on the other hand. makes it clear that the framers and ratifiers of the Bill of Rights were struggling with complex questions, the novelty of which had carried them away from the received wisdom of their time and was forcing their ideas about rights and the protection of those rights to continually evolve.
以上解析由 考满分老师提供。