解析库 > PPPlus

最新提问

我的动态

题目内容

收藏 纠错

题目材料:

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given?
  • AThe penalty for failing to pay the tax on a jar of cooking oil was not significantly greater than the price of the jar of oil.
  • BEven with the tax, the total cost of a jar of cooking oil for a Selean household declined steadily in the years just before and just after the tax was instituted.
  • CDuring the first two years after the tax was in effect, Selean law required merchants to sell cooking oil in jars of the same size as before the tax was instituted.
  • DThe amount of oil used for cooking by Selean households increased after the implementation of the tax.
  • EThe proportion of Selean households that produced their own cooking oil increased significantly after the implementation of the tax.

E显示答案

后才可以添加做题笔记哦,还没有账号? 马上注册

  • KMF 解析
  • 网友解析
  • 题目数据
  • 收起

以上解析由 考满分老师提供。

题目讨论

考满分GRE: 用户头像
已经输入 0 个字 提交
  • 全部讨论
  • 只看提问
  • 按时间排序
  • 按点赞数排序