最新提问
我的动态
登录后查看动态
题目内容
题目材料：
Some oral historians argue that users of oral history should not have to learn special uses of symbols to understand interview transcripts easily; these historians advocate a strong role for editing in making transcripts readable and easily understood. Proponents of this approach recommend changing punctuation, rearranging words, and editing out false starts, crutch words, and the like to enhance the transcript's conveyance of meaning. Others argue for a more cautious approach, asserting that deleted linguistic phenomena are important clues to understanding the meaning conveyed during the interview. They urge editors to conform as closely as possible to the original tape, making only those changes absolutely necessary to clarify for the reader what was said in the interview.
以上解析由 考满分老师提供。
